Up the Creek
After an annual swimming rally in the Nahoon river, concerns were raised after several swimmers fell ill, complaining of possible symptoms of mild E.coli infection. Research was hence conducted to determine the following: \r \r \r The Nahoon River is safe for recreational activity in terms of faecal-coliforms and E.coli \r \r \r Whether the amount of rainfall affects these levels. \r \r \r If faecal pollution is present, to determine the possible point sources of the pollution \r \r \r To devise a method that needs no assistance from a laboratory, and could be done in a home environment at low cost. \r \r \r \r Procedures \r Colilert-18, (the reagent) contains nutrients which react to faecal-coliforms and E.coli in the sample. It causes samples to change colour when contamination is present. A dilution method (used by the Kowie Catchment Campaign) was used to test the severity of the contamination. The dilution levels were as follows: 1, 1/10, 1/100 and 1/1000. A control test was also performed. One Colilert capsule was divided among the five samples, which were incubated in a household stove at 37ºC for 18 hours. A sample was collected every four days and after heavy rainfall. \r The results were rated on a severity scale of 0-4, where a two was considered unsafe for recreational activity. If the undiluted sample remained clear, it was ra ted 0, if all the samples changed colour, it was rated as a four. The same rating system was used when fluorescing samples to test for E.coli. The daily rainfall level was compared to the levels of faecal-coliforms and E.coli. \r Conclusion \r As it has high levels of faecal coliforms and E.coli, the Nahoon River is not safe for recreational activity on a daily basis. \r Heavy rainfall causes the levels of E.coli and faecal coliforms to rise. \r The major source of the contamination is a stream entering the river from a newly developed settlement, and not a leaking sewer. \r This experiment has developed cost-effective home environment testing method which could be used in researching other rivers, marine environments, recreational waters and even drinking water by community researc
Expression of TRPV5 in Astrocytes: Implications for Ischemic Stroke
Elevation of intracellular calcium secondary to increased calcium influx along with increased gliosis are implicated in the pathogenesis of focal ischemic stroke. In astrocytes, which play a major role in maintaining homeostasis in brain ischemia, the identities of the ion channels responsible for increased calcium influx during ischemia is relatively unknown although several Ca2+-permeable transient receptor potential (TRP) channels have been identified to have contributing roles. The transient receptor potential vanilloid 5 (TRPV5) channel is a Ca2+-permeable cationic channel expressed primarily in kidney epithelial cells and at low levels in the brain, but the exact localization and role this channel plays in the brain has not been explored. To investigate the possible role TRPV5 plays in astrocytic calcium influx in ischemia, we examined the functional expression of TRPV5 in astrocytes subjected to hypoxia-ischemia in vitro and in rat models of ischemic stroke in vivo. We hypothesize that TRPV5 contributes to increased calcium influx in ischemia. By treating astrocytes with culture conditions without glucose and with low oxygen levels, we found that TRPV5 is upregulated with increasing durations of simulated hypoxia-ischemia in vitro. Similarly, rat models of ischemic stroke with middle cerebral artery occlusion also show TRPV5 upregulation in reactive astrocytes, suggesting a possible role of TRPV5 in reactive gliosis in vivo. Microfluorimetric intracellular calcium imaging using Fura-2 on primary cultured astrocytes show a voltage-independent increase in astrocytic calcium influx after hypoxia-ischemia in vitro that is selective for extracellular Ca2+ concentration and is reduced by inhibition of TRPV5 with ruthenium red. Electrophysiology measurements using the whole-cell patch clamp technique on primary cultured astrocytes reveal a non-selective cation current similar to that of TRPV5 that is inhibited by Mg2+, another inhibitor of TRPV5. Preliminary results on astrocyte cell viability during hypoxia-ischemia with TRPV5 inhibition by ruthenium red also suggest that inhibition of TRPV5 could enhance astrocyte survival and reactive gliosis in vitro, indicating a beneficial role in blocking non-selective Ca2+ entry via TRPV5 into astrocytes. Since TRPV5 is highly selective for Ca2+ and an important channel for Ca2+ absorption in various epithelial cells, TRPV5 upregulation may contribute significantly to elevated Ca2+ influx in astrocytes in hypoxia-ischemia. Also, Ca2+ influx has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in reactive gliosis, further suggesting that TRPV5 upregulation is involved in reactive gliosis. We propose that TRPV5 is involved in ischemia-induced calcium influx in astrocytes, and might participate in the pathogenesis of focal ischemic stroke.
What really attracts boys to girls
The purpose of this research was to challenge misconceptions about what attracts teenaged boys to girls. It has been observed that some teenaged girls hold stereotypes about boys and believe boys are only attracted to superficial qualities like beautiful hair. The aim is to investigate differences between what girls believe boys find attractive about them and what boys actually find attractive about girls. Hypothesis: There is a significant difference between what teenaged boys find attractive in girls and what teenaged girls think boys find attractive. Procedure Background reading was done to discover which characteristics are commonly used to measure attractiveness among teenagers. A survey questionnaire was used for gathering data. To gather information for the construction of the questionnaire, 4 focus groups were interviewed. The groups were asked to determine indicators of attraction and repulsion. Two separate questionnaires were designed (one for boys and one for girls), based on focus group information, with similar questions which could be used to compare results. Questions were related to personality and looks. The research was representative as 399 teenagers participated in the final survey. Results were collated in Excel tables. Percentages were calculated by using a scientific calculator and Excel. A bivariate analysis was created to examine the main question: ranking qualities that attract boys to girls. A comparison was made between boys’ and girls’ opinions from different age categories. Mean averages were calculated for this question. Other questions were analysed using mode averages translated into percentage of each gender. Graphs were designed using the values calculated. Observations/Data/Results 72% of boys prefer a girl with average looks and an awesome personality but only 37% of girls believed that to be true. The average boys from 12-14, 15-17 and 18-20 year old categories agree that confidence, humour, a nice body, politeness and intelligence are the five most attractive qualities in a girl they would consider dating. The order of these five change across the age groups but are constantly the top five, however confidence and humour always trump a “nice body”. The average 12-14 and 15-17 year old girl overrates a nice body and underrates politeness and intelligence but confidence and humour feature in their top five. The average 18-20 year old girl agrees with the boys priorities. When defining what makes a girl beautiful, 68% of boys highlight personality traits and 59% of boys mentioned physical features. When noting what repulses boys about pretty girls, more than 50% of both sexes agree that smelling bad was most off putting. 52% of boys mentioned taking drugs as unattractive yet only 23% of girls recognized this as repulsive. Conclusions The data supports the hypothesis. Confidence and humour are more important to the average boy than a nice body across all age groups. The younger the girl, the less she understands what attracts boys. 63% of teenaged girls believe that looks are more important to boys than personality. This is clearly not true. 72% of boys value a great personality more highly than good looks.